Requested to be posted here by Kevin_Ring, thanks for your help btw. When working with a photogrammetry capture tool, I find the performance of the captured tileset post-ion processing is very bad, much worse than the Melbourne photogrammetry asset for example, on a dataset that is a much smaller s…

Yes I think this is unfortunately a violation of Google’s terms of use, whether it’s for commercial gain or not. But one thing that jumps out at me is that those instructions say to choose “3D Model” while uploading to Cesium ion. I think “3D Capture” is likely to be much more suitable for this kin…

Final update because it wasn’t entirely true. When using model that was tiled as 3d Capture, it appears the model is loaded prior to entering the scene in Unreal, which was better for me than using the 3D Tiles model, which loaded on approach, after the scene was already started. This worked better …

Imported Photogrammetry Performance Issues

Cesium ion

whackjite July 6, 2022, 2:38pm 3

Did not notice a difference between the two but came to a performance resolution as described here Perfect tool for getting photogrammetry and testing - #12 by whackjite

Topic		Replies	Views
3d Tile Performance inconsistency with imported Photogrammetry Cesium for Unreal	6	508	July 6, 2022
Perfect tool for getting photogrammetry and testing Cesium for Unreal	11	2205	July 6, 2022
Incorrect Lodding and Processing of Photogrammetry to Tilesets Cesium ion	3	125	March 13, 2024
Unable to generate tiles for photogrammetry data Cesium ion	11	646	July 31, 2023
Terrifying visual issues with land photogrammetry Cesium ion	5	525	January 4, 2024

Imported Photogrammetry Performance Issues

Related topics